At the time you must chose one, which is prevailing?
Truth or compassion?
Friendship or Justice?
Beauty or usefulness?
Freedom or Equality?
Solidarity or Prudence?
It is easy to choose between good and bad; the difficulty is to choose between bad and bad or good and good.
The trouble with values is that they are all good.
All good values are not created equal.
Most people will swiftly agree with most of the high values of humankind: freedom, happiness, truth, respect, justice, equality, prudence, compassion, courage, modesty, patience, moderation, harmony, industry and so on. However, ask them which is the most important and prevailing; you will suddenly find in the pattern the striking differences that tell fascists apart from communists and religious fanatics from tolerant free thinkers; or, why not, tolerant believers and fanatic free thinkers  .
Arguably, the difference between sages and fools is also a matter of good sense in judging the priority of values.
The precedence of values passes so unquestioned by persons and groups professing them in good faith that common sense keeps unaware of it and certainly does not examine it. This "obvious" layout defines nevertheless, like a compass shielded from critical sense, who you are, what you respect and what you seek in life. Your value-formula determines what good life is for you and what kind of wisdom fits you.
Your values drive you; if you are not aware of their ordering they drive you from the dark. Bring them to light and examine them, so that you become the rider, not the horse. You do have a right to weigh them fairly and freely - in your head - to chose your own choices.
This call is not theory: your chime, your arrangement of personal values chants who you are.
See the work of Milton Rokeach ex: "The Nature of Human Values" 1973
Friederich Nietzsche, "Twiligt of the Idols" and "Beyond Good and Evil"